Staggered arrival windows
Arrival slots are planned per route rather than per shift, so the fleet lands across a window instead of a spike at the gate.
Employee transport software · Hyderabad, Telangana
Hyderabad concentrates its IT and BPO workforce into a few very large campuses in the west of the city. That makes routing tractable and makes the gate the bottleneck — hundreds of vehicles arriving into the same access roads inside the same fifteen minutes.
Where it runs
Routing is planned around these rather than across a city-wide average.
What breaks a schedule in Hyderabad
These are the local problems a generic routing engine does not know it has.
Shift-change congestion at the campus gate
When every vehicle for a shift is scheduled to arrive at the same moment, the queue forms outside the gate and the on-time figure is decided by the last bus in the line, not the route plan.
Multiple employers, one access road
Campuses in the Financial District share approaches. A plan that is optimal for one employer can be undone by a neighbour running the same shift pattern.
Large-vehicle routing
Big campuses justify coaches, and coaches cannot take every road a cab can. Routing that ignores vehicle class produces plans that look efficient and cannot be driven.
How taSki answers them
Arrival slots are planned per route rather than per shift, so the fleet lands across a window instead of a spike at the gate.
Capacity and vehicle type are part of the route generation, not a dispatch afterthought — a 29-seat coach and a sedan are not given interchangeable plans.
Transport admins see the fleet approaching the campus rather than taking phone calls about where it is.
The platform
The same modules run in every city; the routing model is what adapts.
Shift rosters, ad-hoc requests and attendance in one place, so the transport plan is built from who is actually coming in.
Clustering by pickup density, then routing against real road networks — with ride-time ceilings and vehicle capacity as constraints rather than preferences.
Trips are allocated across your operator panel by coverage, rate card and compliance status, with double-assignment blocked at source.
GPS tracking against the planned route, escort compliance, and an in-app SOS that reaches the transport desk rather than a call centre.
Trips, rate cards and vendor invoices reconciled automatically, so disputes are evidenced rather than argued.
Every allocation, escort assignment and exception timestamped and exportable for statutory or internal compliance reporting.
Questions
Still unanswered? Our solutions team replies within one business day.
Talk to the team →No. taSki is software and owns no vehicles. Your existing transport operators run the trips on the platform. Where you would rather contract once, taSki can also be your transport vendor — in which case taSki holds the agreements with the empanelled operators and you contract only with taSki.
Yes, and most programmes do. Operators onboard onto the Partner Suite in days, usually without changing their commercials. There is no supply lock-in, and no requirement to retender before you can use the software.
One site first. A single Hyderabad location, one shift pattern and one roster is modelled against your current spend, so the business case uses your data rather than a benchmark. Most programmes run four weeks from first site to steady state.
Escort assignment, no-first-no-last-drop logic, driver vetting and in-app SOS are enforced when the route is generated rather than reviewed afterwards, and every decision carries a timestamped record for statutory and internal reporting.
See it on your Hyderabad roster
A 30-minute review using your own roster and rates, not a generic benchmark.
Hi there. How can we help?
Real people, Monday to Saturday