Station-feeder routing
Nodal routes to and from stations are planned as first-class routes, so the programme complements the rail network instead of competing with it.
Employee transport software · Mumbai, Maharashtra
Mumbai is the one Indian metro where employee transport competes with a rail network that is usually faster. The programmes that work here feed the network rather than duplicate it — and cover the hours and routes where it does not.
Where it runs
Routing is planned around these rather than across a city-wide average.
What breaks a schedule in Mumbai
These are the local problems a generic routing engine does not know it has.
Point-to-point road transport is often the slower option
For many employees the local train beats a cab by a wide margin in peak hours. A programme that ignores this pays for capacity people do not use.
Night hours are a different problem entirely
Once services thin out, road transport stops being a convenience and becomes the safety obligation. Demand is concentrated into exactly the hours when escort rules and vehicle checks matter most.
Harbour and creek crossings
Navi Mumbai to the island city is a small number of fixed crossings. A plan that treats it as open road produces timings that fail on the first attempt.
How taSki answers them
Nodal routes to and from stations are planned as first-class routes, so the programme complements the rail network instead of competing with it.
Escort assignment and no-last-drop logic are applied when the route is built — which is where the obligation actually lands.
Crossings are modelled as the constraint they are, rather than averaged into a city-wide speed assumption.
The platform
The same modules run in every city; the routing model is what adapts.
Shift rosters, ad-hoc requests and attendance in one place, so the transport plan is built from who is actually coming in.
Clustering by pickup density, then routing against real road networks — with ride-time ceilings and vehicle capacity as constraints rather than preferences.
Trips are allocated across your operator panel by coverage, rate card and compliance status, with double-assignment blocked at source.
GPS tracking against the planned route, escort compliance, and an in-app SOS that reaches the transport desk rather than a call centre.
Trips, rate cards and vendor invoices reconciled automatically, so disputes are evidenced rather than argued.
Every allocation, escort assignment and exception timestamped and exportable for statutory or internal compliance reporting.
Questions
Still unanswered? Our solutions team replies within one business day.
Talk to the team →No. taSki is software and owns no vehicles. Your existing transport operators run the trips on the platform. Where you would rather contract once, taSki can also be your transport vendor — in which case taSki holds the agreements with the empanelled operators and you contract only with taSki.
Yes, and most programmes do. Operators onboard onto the Partner Suite in days, usually without changing their commercials. There is no supply lock-in, and no requirement to retender before you can use the software.
One site first. A single Mumbai location, one shift pattern and one roster is modelled against your current spend, so the business case uses your data rather than a benchmark. Most programmes run four weeks from first site to steady state.
Escort assignment, no-first-no-last-drop logic, driver vetting and in-app SOS are enforced when the route is generated rather than reviewed afterwards, and every decision carries a timestamped record for statutory and internal reporting.
See it on your Mumbai roster
A 30-minute review using your own roster and rates, not a generic benchmark.
Hi there. How can we help?
Real people, Monday to Saturday